Look out, ornamental tulip beds. Be scared, lemon yellow wallflowers…

One of the more remarked upon contents of The Queen’s Speech, during the State Opening of Parliament this week, was not so much what Her Madge said… as who was sitting on her right hand side. 

Yes, for the first time in 17 years, HRH attended the State Opening alongside his mama, and alongside him was the Duchess, looking really rather splendid. You may have heard the news that the Queen is planning to do a little less this year. While this will doubtless be a disappointment it does rather make sense. We certainly don’t do abdications Dutch style but it’s rather nice, and quite right, as your parents get older, to be able to help share the load, is it not?

Anyway, I was reflecting on all this as I was cycling down the Mall the other day.  You will of course be familiar with the stony grey hulk of Buckingham Palace at its western end, simultaneously one of the most famous and most ugly of the London landmarks; and you will of course know that Prince Charles lives at Clarence House, the Queen Mother’s old house, just next door, which is rather more beautiful being designed by Nash (like the back of Buckingham Palace, before it got refaced by Blore and then in that heavy Edwardian dress by Aston Webb a year before the First World War).

But I wonder if you’ve spotted a quiet revolution that’s been going on in the Mall for a few years now? Yes, it’s the least revolutionary address in Britain, I suppose – but this is real.

I can’t quite remember when it was that I first noticed the wonderful wildflower meadows that now stretch all along the tall brick walls of Clarence House and Marlborough House Gardens.  Certainly three years ago, maybe a couple more. It was a sight of quiet beauty back then, and year after year it’s just been getting better and better.

Regular readers of this blog will know that I’ve got a thing about Cow Parsley… let’s face it – probably the most beautiful flower on earth (May 2011, May 2010, and lots of other posts around about the same time of year)… So it is with particular fascination that I’ve been watching what I am sure were once neatly mown regimental lawns… turn in to this:

Incredible, no?

The camassias are perfect touch, a counterpoint to the paler blue…

But the black and purple tulips are even more spectacular

Queen of the Night tulips are like jewels against the light. The trick, I think, is to plant the bulbs very deep if you want to naturalise them in grass. Of course Prince Charles is rather a master at creating tulip meadows, as we know, with the famous wildflower meadows at Highgrove, so none of this should be any surprise to anyone at all.  

 

If you’ve been drinking in the quiet beauty of the Clarence House planting, it’s all the more of a shock to turn the corner in to the flowerbeds surrounding the giant Victoria Memorial, that fronts Buckingham Palace. 

See what I mean?!

Now we all know that I’ve got nothing against tulips. I love them. And I’ve got nothing against wallflowers. I adore them as much if not more. Let’s face it, I even love tasteless flower colours – my ever-too-slightly-salmon-orange tulips at the Parsonage being a fairly good case in point. I don’t want to be the pot calling the kettle black.

But I am afraid try as I might I do have something against that planting combo. I’d actually be quite interested to see the scarlet tulips and the forget-me-nots growing out of the dark red wallflowers; and the yellow tulips out of the lemon wallflowers, perhaps with a bit of darker yellow wrapped in there… but HELLO!?!?!?! This is bonkers.

But I somehow suspect The Queen finds it very very cheery to look down upon such a display. I bet she peers out of the tall windows of Buckingham Palace just before David Cameron is coming for tea and feels, well, a little less gloomy. Better, after all, to be looking at some riotous tulips than riotous subjects. 

Well, my hunch tells me – than in time to come these beds will subtly change. Or even radically. Yes… if I was those vivid tulips and wallflowers I’d be feeling a trifle nervous seeing Prince Charles sitting at the right hand of The Queen at the State Opening of Parliament. And taking a little more role in the life of the nation…

I’d be even more nervous if I was this bit of desolate lawn to the South of Buckingham Palace and Victoria Memorial. Can it be so very long before this is a glorious, beautiful, soft, mixed meadow grassland? I think that I’m rather looking forward to the future. 


28 comments on this post

  1. Ben says:

    Hello! Nick – literally, a couple of inches deeper than you would normally plant them. Not sure where I heard that advice or whether it really works any better than if you plant them normally… but worth a try! Good luck with the meadow.

  2. Ben says:

    M, I like your way of thinking!!!! I secretly love them too ;-) thank you for reminding me that I do.

  3. Ben, what flowers are blooming in the meadow other than the tulips, cow parsley and camassius? It takes my breath away.
    Your garden also is exquisite.

  4. Nicola says:

    Problem with tulips for your ordinary gardener is…they never look as good in subsequent years as in their first, even if you bury them deeply, feed the leaves etc. Pots are the way to go. Agree with your Devon respondent Margaret P. re Queen of the Night. I also live in Devon and love our gardens.

  5. Beautiful! Please bring us more photos of the Clarence House Meadows in the different seasons.

  6. m says:

    errhem I think I may be in a minority here. I love meadows but also LOVE those bold mad park plantings. I especially love seeing them in the Embankment gardens…. sorry

  7. Vivien says:

    Ben you’ve captured an intoxicatingly beautiful drift of wildflowers which allows the passive observer’s eye to glide over the entire scenery contemplating its various elements, within and beyond, absorbing the harmonious hues, the light and shade, and the textures quietly unifying the man made and the natural, drawing the eye to the depths beyond the drifts. A truly satisfying scenery with the element of delight in the dark tulip highlights culminating in a melodious composition which gladdens one’s heart and leaves you yearning for more…….

  8. Nick Heywood says:

    Dear Ben,

    When you say you think the secret is to bury the tulips deep if you plan to naturalize in a lawn, do you mean that literally, in terms of inches deeper than usually, or just that they should be placed in close proximity to surrounding plants, and thus “buried” in other foliage? If the former, I’ve never heard this advice and I’m intrigued.

    I apologize for the dense question, but I really must know! My partner and I are working on a gradual remeadowing of our lawn in Rhode Island (USA), and this epitomizes the style we’re going for.

    As always, you give us lovely things to look at.
    –Nick

  9. Ben says:

    Charlie I agree. Thank you for the edit…! Ben

  10. Margaret Powling says:

    I call it “Smartie” gardening, after the children’s sweets, those vile carpet beds of garish colours that don’t even clash stylishly! Queen of the Night tulips look best in terracotta pots, I think. Cow parsley is wonderful but sadly it doesn’t smell nice! Love wild flower meadows – I recall first seeing one of these, artfully constructed, at The Garden House, Buckland Monochorum, here in Devon.

  11. Kevin Kornegay says:

    It would be lovely to see wildflower meadows on the Mall in Washington, D.C. The last time I was there, the lawns were in a sorry state due to drought and insufficient maintenance funds. I would have thought that wildflower meadows would be much less labour intensive and use rather less water.

  12. Charlie says:

    Love the tulips! Look fat enough to eat.

  13. Charlie says:

    Good post but I would have preferred the word ‘subjects’ rather than ‘citizens’ in this sentence: Better, after all, to be looking at some riotous tulips than riotous citizens. Not only is it more accurate, it sounds better too.

  14. Norwegian student says:

    Wow, stunning pictures! I really like the contrast in the flowerbeds, where the red flowers just shine through! Amazing!

  15. Cornelia harriet says:

    I always think of dark chanel nail varnish and queen of the night tulips. I planted some carnival tulips last year they are creamy with pink stripes grown with beautiful chickweed. I like the idea of bulbs as they were planted in Winter, and all we have to is wait for them . All the work has already been done. I always admired Prince Charles and his holistic view of the world. I wonder if he has a herb garden, my mother and I always enjoyed the culpeppers herb shop down a little lane in Guildford, now since gone but I think Culpeppers is taken over by Napiers. Mmm lovely summer tomatoes and english chives salad.. sprinkle of salt…

  16. Ben says:

    Dear Liza well I’m hoping that’s true in my case too ;-) now that I am 41 x

  17. Adam W says:

    Dear Ben, regardign CostCo, think less masses, and more common Denominator …. Bargain Basement Bin ……. :(

  18. Liza Vandermeer says:

    Even as a Colonial (my respective ancestors came to Canada on several boats back in the 1830s) I am very much looking forward to what Prince Charles decides to do in the future. Yes, the Duchess looks pretty damn good, as does Chuck himself. Isn’t it nice that nature can be so kind to some people (not stunning when young), in that they look so much better as they age.

  19. Ben says:

    Adam that is hilarious, I’ve never even heard of Costco – very happy to be bringing English dec to the masses ;-)

  20. Adam W says:

    Sod the Tulips, the great topic of debate is the your book is at Costco, I spied it there this weekend…. Never mind the Queen, standards at Ben P HQ appear to be slipping….. pull your socks up….

  21. pimpmybricks says:

    I love your theory and I hope you’re right (I suspect you are). I was watching Prince Chas the other day on television and noted how, finally, he has grown into his face. Grown into it very well too. I find myself liking him quite well these days – surely it can’t be purely an age thing?

    I did wonder, though, what you might mean by “just before David Cameron is coming for tea and feels,” but then I read on. Jetlag, probs.

  22. Madeline says:

    Stunning flower displays. I love reading your postings. They make me smile. This is the first picture I’ve seen of Madge where she looks as fragile as winter’s delicate paper whites. I wanted her to live forever.

  23. Like mother, like son? Definitely not! Those wildflower meadows are breathtaking.

  24. S Louise says:

    This has cheered me up no end (the wildflower bit I mean). How stunningly beautiful it is. Probably saves a load of money too. I agree about cow parsley it is stunning, but I have to say I am rather promiscuous when it comes to flower favourites – can never commit to / choose one!

  25. Sharon says:

    I am growing ammi major, the ‘posh’ cow parsley, no sign of the seeds even sprouting yet. Interested to see what grows later in the summer there, will have a look in August !

  26. Nicola says:

    Nauseating combo!! As if someone got the wrong end of the planting stick. Or, for badness’ sake! Cow parsley in London? Why not? Indoors it sheds tastefully too.

  27. elaine says:

    WOW – love the combination of the of wildflowers with the hit of the dark purple tulip – if only we could see more of this type of planting – just wondering what it looks like when the flowers have gone over. As for the combination of the red and gold – well your comments just about covered what I feel about that.

  28. Graeme says:

    I’m so glad you posted this, I loved passing these wee meadows on my way to the London Library the other day – I think it’s the slowest I have ever walked along the Mall, absolutely stunning.

Leave a comment

Comment Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree


Normal Service Resuming

We are pleased to announce that normal service has resumed. No more politics, no more sadness. It was a beautiful early Summer weekend in Dorset and the blog contains nothing more than images of the garden, of houses and landscape. Which is really what we all like. I had my old boss and friend Charles Morris and his wife staying, and their friend Charlie, and Will.

We went for a walk to Abbotsbury and the coast. The grass seemed particularly vivid after months of turning shades of brown; there’s something about that moment when the trees finally break that is magical; and clouds quickly scudding over the folding hills. 

I love the walk to Abbotsbury, and the moment where the land suddenly falls down to the coast and to Chesil Beach. 

Like so many Estate villages, Abbotsbury is picture perfect. Nothing jars. But what I was liking most of all was the little gardens and allotments tucked about the place, ready for Summer.

We returned via Waddon House, to show Charles and Rachel the perfect proportions of the Portland stone facade.  Waddon is a fragment of a much larger house of which the central section and left wing burned shortly after it was built… I have written about it before. It is my dream house.

Back to the Parsonage in time to catch late afternoon sunshine in the garden.

On Sunday, we went to Chettle House, up towards Cranborne Chase; a beautiful, romantic, English Baroque house  in a gently decaying village where not a lot has changed since the 19th century. The house, by Thomas Archer, is strange, restless; I love its curious detailing and tall sash windows with ancient glass. The curved corners used to be at the ground floor only, and it would be so good to see the upper floors removed… a different house altogether.  To be honest, it is collapsing a bit now. How do we define that moment  when romantic decay gets too much? I think that Chettle may have just slipped over that edge. “It’s looking a little Chettled” is a phrase that might make its way into my language.

From Chettle, we made our way through villages and via the Museum at Farnham (The Museum is an excellent pub, in case you were wondering) to Rushmore Park, where a very long time ago I’d been at school. The soft expansive beauty of Cranborne Chase always takes my breath away.

 

Monday was bright and brilliant. I spent all day in the garden.

I put up my bean poles, and planted beans and peas, sweetcorn and lettuces, courgettes and squash.

The tulips are putting on a crazy display at last. But I suspect will soon be over.

And the auriculas are just turning, as irises and aquilegia come through. It feels like it’s been the shortest spring ever, rather like being in New York, where winter suddenly turns to summer with just a week of spring in between.

But it was, basically, a perfect weekend. Normal service has resumed.


10 comments on this post

  1. Sometimes we all need a dose of reality. I was glad in particular to read your Syria post and appreciate your willingness to write about the tough things that are happening around us everyday.

  2. jane says:

    normal or abnormal as long as services continue.

  3. Pippin says:

    The tulips are looking wonderful again this year. How many do you plant? I put in 350 this year, although I think only just over half have come up. The flooding at the end of last year isn’t their ideal growing conditions! Do you replace your tulips every year, or do you find that some will come up again? In previous gardens that I have moved into there have been a few yellow tulips that have reappeared year after year, so I am trying yellow ones to see if it will work for me.

  4. Anna says:

    I think your parsonage (with garden) is my dream house! Glad to see that Spring has arrived for you.

  5. elaine says:

    The Parsonage is certainly in a beautiful part of the country sounds like you had a good weekend. I am surprised that you have planted beans and courgetttes out so early – aren’t you worried about late frosts. The spring garden is looking good

  6. Margaret Powling says:

    Love Chettle from these photos … didn’t know of it, the only house we have visited in Dorset is Kingston Lacy (a favourite of mine, and love the story behind it … for this get yourself a copy of Anne Sebba’s The Exiled Collector.) Love your landscape photos, too, Dorset being a particularly beautiful county (and I say that living in Devon, which isn’t without some delightful landscapes of its own!)

  7. Mary Andrews says:

    I loved your use of the word “restless” to describe Chettle House. Lyrical prose coupled with exquisite photography make your blog exceptional.

    I agree, “normal” or “abnormal” Ben Pentreath posts are always worth reading.

  8. Ayse says:

    Ahh,it all looks wonderfull!

  9. ceri says:

    Lovely — but we do enjoy your abnormal service too!

  10. jo says:

    beautiful ben. i envy your little plot. it is gorgeous.
    jo

Leave a comment

Comment Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree


The Politics of Architecture

A lighthearted midweek post. Honest. 

For those American readers who’ve never heard or understood of weird British politics, let me explain a few things. We’ve got two main political parties, just like you. Labour and Conservative. Both of which turn every year more and more American; in style, image and lack of substance.

But unlike you, we have a lot of minor ones. Because no one wants to vote for the major ones, the minor ones are rattling the cage of politics right now. Right now, in fact, they hold the balance of power: our Coalition government is a mix of two groups (the Conservatives, who have teamed up with the Liberals) who, charmingly, pathologically hate each other, it seems to me, more than either of them hate the other side. Weird, but true. Are you with me so far?

Well, there’s a new kid on the block. They are called UKIP. In fact they’re a very old-fashioned kindof kid, but in the last 3 minutes they’ve been making rather a lot of hot air because no-one had ever taken them seriously before and suddenly they are… if not quite winning votes…  at least stopping the Conservatives from winning votes. Because they are almost more conservative than Conservatives, without necessarily being crazy religious gun-totin’ gay-hatin’ fruitcakes, like your Conservatives over there in the New World.

So all sorts of conservative folk have decided the Conservatives have let them down (by teaming up with those Liberals) and they’re going to take their vote elsewhere, thank you very much too.

UKIP stands for the UK Independence Party and for years they’ve stood on the basis of one thing only. They want Britain to get out of Europe. And they hate the Euro, and they really hate Immigration. What I’ve always found odd about this is that my gut feeling is that by far and away the biggest supporters of UKIP seem to be a variety of fat, rather crude, doubtless charming-under-the-surface-but-I’ve-never-quite-seen-it, retired English people who’ve decided to live their latter years in Spain and spend the whole time complaining about the friggin locals. Which, of course, they can only do because we’re part of Europe, otherwise they’d still be scrabbling about in the cold and rain in some desperate suburb of a northern city.

Of course, my dear mum threatens to vote UKIP all the time, but I wonder if she ever has?

My politics has always been pretty simple. Do unto others as you would have them do unto you. You leave me alone and I’ll leave you alone.  Let me do what I want in the bedroom and I won’t try and stop you from fox hunting or wearing a brass cross around your neck at work, if it really is important. You be civilised to me; I’ll be nice back.

Oh, and my second rule, is always try and look at every problem from the opposite point of view.  Clearly no good if you’re looking for a strong leader, but luckily I spend my weekends pottering around in my veg garden instead of deciding how to lead. It’s the politics of understanding. 

Without wanting to get personal, I’ve only ever voted Labour in my life. Which is weird because if you looked at me you’d think I was a nice true blue Tory (that’s slang for a Conservative, for the American audience. You see, it’s all being explained here). Well, I probably am a true blue Tory, at least by nurture, if not by nature. Like: obviously I should want lower high rates of taxes and all? Yes, but I always think it’s a bit more… interesting… not to vote in one’s own personal interest. Don’t you?  Voting just for yourself seems, hmmm, rather narrow-minded.   

OKAY OKAY I HEAR A COLLECTIVE YAWN, why de F**K is ben pentreath ranting on again?

Well, back to UKIP, if you will. 

Yesterday, I happened to discover a rather weird video that some nutcase supporter of UKIP has placed on You tube.  At time of writing, it has 64 views. Obviously I expect that number to rise dramatically now that I’ve brought it to the attention of thousands of metropolitan sophisticates just like you.

Here it is.  If you’re in your office, please put your headphones on. The swelling soundtrack is critical to the mood of the film.  If you’re reading at home, please turn up the volume button.

Why am I so fussed? 

Because 38 seconds in to this piece of drama, BUILDINGS THAT I HAVE DESIGNED OPEN THE FLIPPING FILM. HELLO!?!?!??!?!

As the dramatic music swells, the dreadfully-filmed video swoops around a group of houses called Woodland Crescent, that I designed years ago now, in Prince Charles’s development in Poundbury. The grainy film effect is slightly sinister, a little creepy. The score makes me wonder if by 1 minute and 7 seconds I’m about to witness some dreadful murder. No: we are just learning that this is how UK Independence Party wants Britain to look.

Okay, okay, I appreciate that once you’ve put a building up – it belongs to everyone. A fact that from time to time I think might be forgotten by one or two Starchitects, who I sometimes think are just designing for themselves. But nonetheless, this is rather taking it too far. At 1 minute 35 more buildings that I’ve designed (this time in Scotland) pop up.  

At which point, I couldn’t help thinking: GUYS, please leave me alone, if I leave you alone!!

So. I know that for centuries buildings have been political things. No more so than in the 20th century: Mussolini, Albert Speer, Stalin, I know, I know, Classical architecture is deeply totalitarian blah blah.  Oh god, even worse, then there are the counter arguments, about meaning in architecture, and 20th century modernists using everyone as little lab rats, and the fact that Greece was the original democracy…….. and…. well, you can see why I want to throw myself off a cliff when politicians and pundits start talking about architecture and vice versa.

For me, I just want to design a few nice houses. I want them to look nice, I’d quite like them to fit in, I want people to be happy there, I want them to be well-proportioned and well detailed and I want the people who are building those houses to feel a little sense of pride that they’ve made something worthwhile at the end of the day.  (I’m not sure that if you’re a bricklayer for a volume house builder you necessarily feel that).

What’s this all about? The trauma, perhaps, of finding out suddenly that I’m a poster boy for a political party that I think is a joke?  Needing to get a few things off my chest?  Or merely proving the rule that you should never drink 4 glasses of wine while composing a blog about politics one evening? 

We had a good laugh about the UK Independence Party in the office this morning. But, in all honesty, I’d sooner they’d leave my buildings out of it.


15 comments on this post

  1. Tony Kiley says:

    Unhappily the UKIP video is now private. Love your work Mr Pentreath. Architects and especially students need to realize that the Venice Charter has become a licence to print Modernism. Viva the architects that produce buildings that look like they have always been there.

  2. domestos goddess says:

    Oh Ben. Now I truly love you.

  3. NancyJoan says:

    Um, I think this *proves* the rule that you should only post after 4 glasses of wine! :) That music just is ridiculous!

  4. Charlie says:

    I would hope the people building the houses/temples of aesthetics would feel more than just a little pride. If you have ever had a bad plastering job, I am sure you will understand.

  5. S Louise says:

    That might explain why I like this blog so much Mr. Ben Pentreath.

    As others have pointed out the UKIP video does highlight some important architectural considerations. They should most definitely be high on the agenda – but I’m not sure if it should be a political one. Architecture, for me at least, has always been about taste first, functionality a close second. That’s why leaving such decisions to civil servants / the incumbent party who might be voted out in a few years’ time usually brings disasterous results. But of course they are the ones who hold the purse strings….or in some cases are in the pockets of the giant corporations who build these monstrosities…and therein lies the dilemma. We need an expert (=good taste), long-term, practical vision unfettered by the restrictions of lobbying.

    UKIP’s vision for the future of this country’s architecture is commendable, but I’d like to see where / how they are going to house everyone once they’ve forbidden all housing estates and tower blocks. I’d like to see how they’re going to pay for the restoration and renovation of historical buildings (I’m no architect but I’ve always been told renovating is much more expensive than buliding from scratch?) If UKIP was a business I wouldn’t invest, as it seems that they don’t even have a business plan.

  6. Mike says:

    Canada has Tories, too- not as interesting as their British cousins though their party has been through a few changes over the years from Progressive Conservative back to plain Conservative after reuniting with the splinter reform party. Like you I’m a Tory in certain aspects- great respect for the monarchy & history and I certainly like law and order. Like you I’m also gay & fairly liberal on social policy and could never vote for Republicans here in the US, though it might benefit me economically. The sensible Republicans are long gone and I don’t think they’ll be returning anytime soon. I’ve always envisioned UKIP as a British version of the Tea Party nutters we have; older,anti just about everything & always going on about the invading “hordes”. Though as you pointed out, they’re not gun fetishists- one of the Tea Party/NRA types recently said he would tell the parents of the kids shot at Sandy Hook to “go to hell” for wanting to restrict his second amendment rights. Because obviously background checks are far worse than 20 slaughtered children, right? Ugh. While it may not be as civilized as one would like in the UK at least you’re not living in a nation that is stark raving mad.

  7. Charles Smith says:

    It is unfortunate that you can only see the UKIP question through a liberal filter. To allow the level of immigration on the British people without first obtaining consent is highly undemocratic. Moreover, to refer to those who now live in Spain as “fat and crude”, is to refer in the same way, to the same DNA, that Won the second World War, and built the many buildings and machines of lasting and wonder. No! Those that are “crude” are those that group together those they do not know, or have not met, and without asking them what talent they have or what talent they could be given and to discard them with distain. Having got that off my chest I really love your architecture and no I don’t live in Spain!

  8. Suzy O'Brien says:

    Ben Pentreath is fabulously entertaining, especially after 4 glasses of wine. A great read.

  9. jill says:

    I felt like I was watching a nazi propaganda film – it was so heavy-handed! crazy -

  10. Rachel says:

    Bravo to UKIP for its position on historic preservation and supporting artisan workers; I agree with EC that UKIP should be given credit for raising this as a political issue, because, it is – though, interestingly, in America, historic preservation is most definitely a liberal (Democrat) cause. (Because just like how Conservative Republicans don’t want you telling them what they can do with their guns, they don’t want to be told what they can and can’t do with their property. OH! But this principle doesn’t apply to one’s body. Confused? Rightly so.)

    Wonderful comment overall by EC. You have a great blog, and great readers. Love the dialog here.

  11. EC says:

    It’s clear that this discussion is actually about building regulations and the planning process. Both of these, especially planning, are by definition, political areas. We might agree that UKIP are mad, but at least this video brings the discussion about vernacular architecture to the fore. Usually, it is very much in the political background, and we have the madness of the local and regional plans to contend with, unchallenged, as a result. Of course we all know that the dismal architecture of the post-war years stemmed directly from political decisions. [To Sylvie - I'm sure you had a great time living in Cripps, but that's not quite the point. Certainly there is a place for experimental architecture - but you can't exactly criticise a tourist for thinking that a particular, unique, historic view has been defiled, as indeed it has been. In east London, in Cambridge suburbs:- fine, modernism isn't spoiling much. In a historic area, an architect's/college's spur-of-the-moment decision to have a witty juxtaposition of old and new irreversibly changes the character of an area. This style of post-war academic building had a specific overt political/social purpose, as I'm sure you're well aware.] The left conspicuously, continually, identified with modernism. Look a soviet art! Look at our wartime government posters! Look at the whole pattern of post-war development! Listen to recordings of Goldfinger! Of course modernist architecture now has the socialist cultural baggage it has. Contrastingly, it’s far to simple to say that classicism is the language of totalitarianism – if that’s what’s taught in architecture schools then it’s a woeful indictment of their sense of and connection with history. For a start, it has a much longer history than modernism – fascism engaged and copied with a particular derivative of it only. BP might feel uncomfortable designing smaller houses, not tower-blocks, and being seen as conservative. But this isn’t really a question of C20th history, it’s about the future.

    All the historical debate about modernism slightly misses the point: what building rules would you change? The 1774 legislation was so successful because it not only caused a great social improvement by ensuring that buildings were built to better/larger/more hygienic standards, but also was drafted with an eye to the aesthetics of the buildings which would be built in conformity to it. The contemporary acts are not so sensible. Ridicule UKIP by all means, but no main party has suggested amending the contemporary building acts in a sensible way. The result? Ugliness at best, and social collapse, as is well documented. Perhaps they might, if an architect comes up with good recommendations. Carefully drafted legislation might even provide more jobs in on-the-site skills, by discouraging prefab components. BP – any suggestions?
    Ditto the planning system. Isn’t the regional/local central planning mad? What’s wrong, or even particularly right-wing, about suggesting that local democracy would lead to better planning?

    The thing is, if we laugh the whole debate off as a nonsense because we don’t like the participants, the legislative framework will continue to allow buildings which you, by being a reader of this blog, are almost certain to consider awful. Wouldn’t that be a shame?

  12. May says:

    In vino veritas, indeed!

  13. Bridie says:

    The video made me feel like we were in Braveheart but without Mel Gibson (he would LOVE UKIP!)

  14. Sylvie says:

    Dear Ben, a few years ago I was back in Cambridge for a few days and took the kids on a punt ride. We passed Saint John’s College and Cripps building, where I used to have my rooms. Another punt full of tourists passed by and the guy who was doing the tour pointed to the “modernist monstrosity” that Cripps building was supposed to be. I could have drowned him on the spot. I adored Cripps. Not only because I spent there some of the best years of my life but also because it was so wonderfully designed. I recently read in a book that the wise people of Saint John’s wanted it to last at least 500 years (yeah, not 6 or 7 years… 500). The stone, the windows, the wooden floors: everything was carefully chosen with this in mind. Anyway, my point is that you are absolutely right: a good building is one in which people are happy to live, with an great attention to details and to the life of the people inside… and from that point of view (sorry, guy on the punt) Cripps is perfect, brutalist (brutalist?) as it is. UKIP’s video made me shiver (which was the point I suppose) because of the abysmal lack of culture that make them put in a same bag Norman Foster and the jerks that “designed” the housing towers that are demolished in the film. Terrifying!

  15. scone says:

    Tragically, if you work in a more or less historical style, you get lumped in with Conservatives, Tories, Neo-Troglodytes, whatever. Modernism has always been identified with the Left. Never mind that some Lefties were/are pretty conservative in “personal taste” terms– Orwell hated central heating.

    And anyone who doesn’t fall into line, on one side or another, is out in the cold, with no tribe for protection. Look how Christopher Alexander got beaten up. I don’t think you can escape making political statements in your work. Or in your writing, dress, mannerisms, food choices, etc. Your choices define you, in the eyes of others, at least. The attitude is: “you’re either with us or against us…”

Leave a comment

Comment Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree